The running industry has a messaging problem. Every brand is promoting their fastest shoe, every influencer is flexing carbon plates on camera (incorrectly, as it turns out), and almost nobody is talking about the thing that actually determines whether a runner reaches their goal: staying healthy long enough to train consistently.

Gelindo Bordin has watched this play out from a position few people occupy. He won the Olympic marathon in Seoul in 1988, won Boston in 1990, and is still the only man to hold both titles simultaneously. After retiring in 1993, he joined Diadora and has spent the years since working in product development and marketing for one of the only fully Italian running brands still competing at the specialty level. He is not a critic from the outside. He is operating inside the system and choosing to say the quiet part out loud.

Listen on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or other podcast platforms.

The carbon plate craze is not inherently bad. The problem is that almost no one in the market understands what a carbon plate actually does, including many of the people reviewing and selling the shoes.

Bordin is direct about this. The carbon plate works by making the shoe stiff. That stiffness creates a longer lever at takeoff, transferring energy more efficiently through the ankle and calf. When influencers demonstrate a shoe by flexing it and watching it spring back, they are showing a shoe performing incorrectly. A carbon plate shoe that bends easily is not working as designed.

Beyond the mechanics, there is a training load problem. The sprinting world figured this out long ago. Elite sprinters do not train in their carbon-plated race shoes because they need recovery between sessions. Recreational runners are doing the opposite: wearing their fastest shoes every day and then wondering why injury rates are climbing. The shoe that helps you run your fastest race cannot also be your daily trainer.

Diadora's product philosophy starts with a premise most brands skip: a runner finishing a marathon in five hours needs a fundamentally different shoe than one finishing in two. Not just a cushier version of the same thing. A different foam compound, tuned to a different frequency of ground contact.

Most brands work with two compounds. Diadora runs five across their line. The reasoning is grounded in physics: foam compounds have an optimal energy return frequency, and that frequency has to match the speed of the runner using it. A compound built for a sub-2:10 marathoner is returning energy too fast to be effective for someone running five-hour pace. The technology is not broken. It is just mismatched.

This approach costs more to develop and is harder to explain at retail. But it is the operational expression of a stated mission: treat every consumer like a top runner, which means building specifically for their actual needs rather than scaling down from elite.

Bordin makes the same point about training and business in nearly the same breath: the most important variable is showing up long enough for adaptation to happen. For runners, that means building a training base without getting injured. For brands, that means not pivoting product philosophy every season.

The parallel runs deeper than motivation. When a runner switches from a high-drop shoe to a low-drop shoe too quickly, different muscle groups are activated, transition stress spikes, and injury risk goes up. The body needs time to adapt. The same logic applies when a brand changes direction: consumers who trusted the product have to relearn what the brand stands for, and that trust does not rebuild quickly.

Bordin points to the brands still in the top tier of specialty running as proof. The ones that have lasted are the ones that stayed focused. The ones that chased lifestyle or pivoted to trail or tried to be everything to everyone lost time they are still trying to make up.

Diadora made a deliberate choice to sell exclusively through specialty running retail in the US. It costs them online revenue and limits their reach. Bordin does not apologize for it.

The logic: you can build the best shoe in the world, but if it ends up on the wrong foot, it fails. The only way to reliably get the right product to the right consumer is to put knowledgeable humans in the middle of that transaction. Specialty retailers are those humans. They understand the product, they watch the customer move, they ask the right questions. An e-commerce algorithm cannot replicate a gait analysis and a conversation.

Every well-suggested shoe is a win for the brand. Every poor fit is a loss, not just of that customer, but of the word-of-mouth and trust that specialty retail is built on.

There is a section of every industry conversation about long-term thinking that sounds like a marketing platitude. Bordin makes it operational.

Diadora is still family-owned. The owner is patient. That patience means product decisions can be made on a three-to-five year horizon instead of a quarterly one. It means the brand can hold its specialty retail focus even when online would be faster money. It means R&D investments in injury research get funded without needing an immediate return.

The contrast with investor-backed brands is stark. Investor timelines push for growth that outpaces category knowledge. Family-owned brands can wait for the market to catch up to their positioning. Neither model is universally better, but the choice of ownership structure has downstream effects on every product, marketing, and distribution decision a company makes.

On the question of how to filter consumer feedback from noise, Bordin does not point to social listening tools or NPS scores. He describes going to marathon expos and race events and watching people try shoes on, in person, in real time.

The feedback at the moment of fit is unfiltered. People's faces tell you whether the shoe is working. That is the signal. Retailer feedback is useful but comes with its own bias: retailers are influenced by what is selling elsewhere, by the last brand rep who came through, by their own preferences. The final consumer, trying the shoe for the first time without context, is the clearest data point available.

It is a low-tech answer from someone who works at a brand with an on-site innovation lab and multiple R&D partnerships. But it is consistent with the larger theme: the fundamentals matter more than the sophistication.

Carbon plate shoes are a specialized tool, not a daily trainer: The stiffness that makes carbon plates effective for racing also alters load mechanics in ways that accumulate over daily training. Using race-day shoes every day is a meaningful injury risk the market is not communicating clearly enough.

Compound matching is the hidden variable in shoe performance: Energy return works within a frequency range. A foam tuned for elite pace returns energy too fast for a recreational runner. Brands building five compounds instead of two are making a real product decision, not a marketing one.

Transition speed is where injury actually lives: Whether changing drop, cushion height, or shoe type, the risk is in the speed of the change, not the change itself. Bodies adapt, but adaptation takes weeks. Abrupt switches override that process.

Brand consistency compounds the same way training does: Brands that have stayed in the top tier of specialty running all share one trait: they did not pivot when the market got noisy. The ones that chased lifestyle or trail or viral moments may have gotten short-term returns, but most lost positioning they are still trying to rebuild.

Specialty retail is a distribution philosophy, not just a channel: Choosing to sell only through specialty retail is a statement about what the product requires. It trades online revenue for fit quality, consumer education, and the trust that comes from an expert recommendation.

The clearest consumer signal comes from watching someone try the shoe: Surveys, reviews, and social feedback all carry noise. The real data is the facial reaction at first wear. Brands that build feedback loops around that moment know something the ones relying on digital analytics often miss.

Stay Connected

Jon is a runner, cyclist, and podcast host from Boston, MA, who now lives in Boulder, CO. For The Long Run is aimed at exploring the why behind what keeps runners running long, strong, and motivated.

Follow Jon on Instagram, LinkedIn, and Twitter.